Numerical and Experimental Investigations on Supersonic Ejectors

By Y. Bartosiewicz, Z. Aidoun, P. Desevaux, Y. Mercadier. 2005

387 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Aerospace Engineering, Applied Mathematics, Mechanical Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0481ef8305a1ebeb718332b1cfc9fd9202e08533

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Aerospace Engineering

1. Pascal Bruel
2. Erwin Franquet
3. Vincent Perrier
4. S. Gibout

In Mechanical Engineering

1. C. Wen
2. Yinhai Zhu
3. W. Cai
4. Yanzhong Li

Citations in the corpus

• Shock circle model for ejector performance evaluation (2007, methodology): “To improve the accuracy, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) techniques based on numerical solutions of the flow domain for ejector modeling have been proposed [18–20].”
• Free underexpanded jets in a quiescent medium: A review (2015, methodology): “Logically, this approach has been largely tested [9, 22, 24, 27, 37, 45, 46, 58, 59, 77, 80, 80, 93, 119, 146, 164, 182, 189, 190, 200, 217, 235, 267, 291], with the k − ε model in an overwhelming majority of papers (be it its incompressible formulation or some of the proposed compressibility correc”
• CFD analysis of a supersonic air ejector. Part I: Experimental validation of single-phase and two-phase operation (2009, methodology): “:3) model is able to give good results although some authors [2, 3, 13, 14] already highlighted the large sensitivity of the chosen turbulence approach depending on the ejector operations.”