Estimating Granger causality from fourier and wavelet transforms of time series data.
By M. Dhamala, Govindan Rangarajan, Mingzhou Ding. Physical Review Letters, 2007
323 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Experiments in many fields of science and engineering yield data in the form of time series. The Fourier and wavelet transform-based nonparametric methods are used widely to study the spectral characteristics of these time series data. Here, we extend the framework of nonparametric spectral methods to include the estimation of Granger causality spectra for assessing directional influences. We illustrate the utility of the proposed methods using synthetic data from network models consisting of interacting dynamical systems.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Economics and Econometrics, Signal Processing
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/043cd83ae1901746b449743961fab137481f31b9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Yong Zou
- Norbert Marwan
- Jonathan F. Donges
- Reik V. Donner
- David Cai
- Jürgen Kurths
- Ali Shojaie
- Emily B. Fox
In Economics and Econometrics
- Norbert Marwan
- Jürgen Kurths
- Yong Zou
- Reik V. Donner
- Jonathan F. Donges
- Jean-François Muzy
- Emmanuel Bacry
- Ali Shojaie
In Signal Processing
- Norbert Marwan
- Jürgen Kurths
- Ali Shojaie
- Emily B. Fox
- David Cai
- Yong Zou
- Martin A. Vinck
- Jonathan F. Donges
Citations in the corpus
- Hawkes Processes in Finance (2015, background): “In particular, the notion of Granger-causality has been extended to point-processes in [57, 25].”
- Alpha-beta and gamma rhythms subserve feedback and feedforward influences among human visual cortical areas (2016, unknown): “Therefore, we used a non-parametric approach, which estimates GC directly from a factorization of the cross-spectral density (CSD) matrix (Dhamala et al., 2008).”
- Complex network approaches to nonlinear time series analysis (2019, methodology): “Variousmethods have been proposed to extract the statistical associations fromdata, for instance, Pearson correlation,mutual information (including its timedelayed version) [24,25], Granger causality [26,27], transfer entropy [28,29], or methods for detecting coupling directions from time series dat”
- Granger Causality: A Review and Recent Advances (2021, methodology): “Alternatively, one can also use tests in the spectral domain, using Fourier or wavelet representations (Geweke, 1982; Dhamala et al., 2008).”
- Gamma-band synchronization in the neocortex: novel analysis methods and their application to sensory and motivational systems (2013, methodology): “Note that using matrix spectral factorization, the VAR model can also be obtained from the S in return (Dhamala et al., 2008).”
- Analyzing information flow in brain networks with nonparametric Granger causality (2008, unknown): “From the minimum-phase spectral factor Ψ, noise covariance matrix Σ and minimum-phase transfer function H(f) can be obtained as X ¼ A 0 A T 0 ð5Þ and H ¼ WA À1 0 ð6Þ such that ΨΨ ⁎ = HΣH ⁎ (Dhamala et al., 2008).”
- Detecting Causality in Complex Ecosystems (2012, unknown): “Applications typically use vector autoregression (VAR) (59, 60), conditional mutual information (CMI) (55, 61-70), or spectral methods (16, 57, 71-73).”
- Analysis of sampling artifacts on the Granger causality analysis for topology extraction of neuronal dynamics (2014, methodology): “…out that these sampling issues arise from how discrete time series for the GC analysis are sampled from continuous time processes and they need to be addressed regardless of whether one uses a parametric method or a non-parametric method for the GC evaluation (Geweke, 1982; Dhamala et al., 2008).”