Cluster-based under-sampling approaches for imbalanced data distributions
By Show-Jane Yen, Yue-Shi Lee. Expert systems with applications, 2009
740 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0421c3afe37ad35ff36b7a9b1d8da3ee68275be3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Jimeng Sun
- Duen Horng Chau
- Hien M. Nguyen
- Scott Freitas
- Eric W. Cooper
- Rahul Duggal
- Katsuari Kamei
- Sunny Dhamnani
Citations in the corpus
- ELF: An Early-Exiting Framework for Long-Tailed Classification (2020, background): “For example, SMOTE [4] oversamples the minority class through linear interpolation, whereas [16] undersamples by clustering the majority class examples and replacing them with a few anchor points.”
- Borderline over-sampling for imbalanced data classification (2009, methodology): “Other methods perform a clustering of the whole training set, and then apply a certain sampling technique to the resulting clusters that may consist of both the minority and majority instances (Cieslak and Chawla, 2008; Yen and Lee, 2009).”
- Striking the Right Balance With Uncertainty (2019, neutral): “Clustering [59] 75.”
- Classification with class imbalance problem: A review (2015, neutral): “the research in [59] that use clustering to choose representatives training examples to gain better accuracy prediction for minority class.”
- A Survey of Predictive Modeling on Imbalanced Domains (2016, neutral): “Nevertheless, SMOTE generates synthetic examples with the positive class label, disregarding the negative class examples that may lead to overgeneralization [Yen and Lee 2006; Maciejewski and Stefanowski 2011; Yen and Lee 2009].”