The HSSP database of protein structure-sequence alignments and family profiles

By C. Dodge, Reinhard Schneider, Christopher Sander. 1998

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Roman A. Laskowski
2. Kuo-Chen Chou
3. Janet M. Thornton
4. Nicola J. Mulder
5. Michele Magrane
6. Rolf Apweiler
7. John A. Capra
8. Evelyn Camon

Citations in the corpus

• Predicting functionally important residues from sequence conservation (2007, methodology): “Relative Entropy: RE, or the Kullback–Leibler divergence, is often used to compare probability distributions ( Cover and Thomas, 1991 ).”
• A critical view on conservative mutations. (2001, methodology): “The subset was expanded through the use of the corresponding HSSP-files (Dodge et al., 1998).”
• Predicting Protein Ligand Binding Sites by Combining Evolutionary Sequence Conservation and 3D Structure (2009, methodology): “All alignments come from the Homology-derived Secondary Structure of Proteins (HSSP) database [70].”
• The Gene Ontology Annotation (GOA) project: implementation of GO in SWISS-PROT, TrEMBL, and InterPro. (2003, methodology): “The statistical and comparative analyses are compiled using InterPro, CluSTr (Kriventseva et al. 2001), and GO and contain structural information derived from the HSSP (Dodge et al. 1998) and PDB (Westbrook et al. 2002) databases.”