China's carbon emissions embodied in (normal and processing) exports and their driving forces, 2006–2012

171 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

China's “Exported Carbon” Peak: Patterns, Drivers, and Implications (2018, methodology): “Xu et al. (2011), Su and Thomson (2016), and Pan et al. (2017) used the SDA approach to analyze the determinants of the changes in China’s export-embodied emissions for 2002–2008, 2006–2012, and 1997–2012, respectively.”
The key sectors for energy conservation and carbon emissions reduction in China: Evidence from the input-output method (2018, methodology): “In addition, the input-output (IO) method has been widely used to assess the environmental impact of socio-economic activities (Labandeira and Labeaga, 2002; Machado et al., 2001; Mongelli et al., 2006; Su and Thomson, 2016).”
Identifying primary energy requirements in structural path analysis: A case study of China 2012 (2017, background): “Since input-output models considering both intermediate and final use 19 can capture the economic relationships among industrial sectors [21], a series of studies 20 have carried out input–output analyses for energy, water and emission embodiments in 21 the economic activities at different scales [2”
Decoupling or delusion? Measuring emissions displacement in foreign trade (2018, background): “Rather, from the perspective of globally climate efficient distribution of production, each country should specialize according to comparative carbon advantages (Antweiler et al., 2001; Atkinson et al., 2011; Su and Thomson, 2016).”