Comparison of Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Bayesian information criterion (BIC) in selection of stock–recruitment relationships

By Yanjun Wang, Qun Liu. 2006

173 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0402657d52dd63569ba935aa5fd3a97200947252

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Po-Chun Chen
2. G. You
3. Chih-Chiang Wei
4. H. Acquah
5. Yuan-Heng Wang

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Po-Chun Chen
2. G. You
3. Chih-Chiang Wei
4. H. Acquah
5. Yuan-Heng Wang

Citations in the corpus

• Comparison of methods for non-stationary hydrologic frequency analysis: Case study using annual maximum daily precipitation in Taiwan (2017, methodology): “BIC is better suited to nested models (Wang and Liu, 2006).”
• Comparison of Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Bayesian information criterion (BIC) in selection of an asymmetric price relationship (2010, methodology): “Although AIC and BIC have been compared theoretically and empirically (Weakliem, 1999; Kuha, 2004) and examined empirically with respect to selection of stock-recruitment relationships (Wang and Liu, 2006) there has been no”