Does TOD Need the T?
By D. Chatman. 2013
209 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Automotive Engineering, Transportation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/03f4940e1f48057f1315b2b3a0f575135eef25e4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Automotive Engineering
In Transportation
Citations in the corpus
- Accessibility and Transit-Oriented Development in European metropolitan areas (2015, unknown): “On the other hand, studies also highlight that other factors (e.g. housing type and tenure, local and sub-regional density, bus service level, and especially parking availability) can play a much more important role than proximity to transit (Chatman, 2013).”
- Is transit-oriented development (TOD) an internationally transferable policy concept? (2018, unknown): “However, the difference is not explained by rail access alone: other TOD aspects such as on-and off-street parking, housing type and tenure, density, and bus service are as important (Chatman, 2013; Renne & Wells, 2002; van Lierop, Maat, & El-Geneidy, 2017).”
- Evaluating Public Transit Benefits and Costs (2015, background): “Chatman (2013), found substantially lower vehicle ownership, and lower auto commute and shopping trip mode shares for households located in transit-oriented development, but that residential density, housing type, local bus service and limited parking supply had more impact than rail accessibility.”