A Research Agenda For DSM-V

By David J. Kupfer, M. First, D. Regier. 2002

598 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Toward DSM-V: basic nomenclature issues. Proposed basic and clinical neuroscience research agenda to guide the development of a pathophysiologically-based classification. Report from developmental issues and diagnosis work group. A research agenda for addressing crucial gaps in the DSM: personality disorders and relational disorders. Mental disorders and disability: time to reevaluate the relationship? Beyond the funhouse mirrors: research agenda on culture and psychiatric diagnosis

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/03eec20df7fcb6bcbe6fc2e024cad3d1133487de

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Diagnostic categories or dimensions? A question for the Diagnostic And Statistical Manual Of Mental Disorders--fifth edition. (2005, background): ““Lack of treatment specificity is the rule rather than the exception” (Kupfer et al., 2002, p. xviii).”
Open, aware, and active: contextual approaches as an emerging trend in the behavioral and cognitive therapies. (2011, background): “In combination with concerns about the progressivity of syndromal models (Kupfer et al. 2002), and philosophical changes (Hayes 2004), work began to emerge from a variety of laboratories that eschewed direct cognitive change and focused instead on acceptance, mindfulness, metacognition, the…”
Counselors' Perceptions of Training, Theoretical Orientation, Cultural and Gender Bias, and Use of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV-Text Revision (2008, methodology): “The above acknowledgements by Kupfer et al. (2002), a group of people wielding influence over the content of the DSM-V, validate an effort to respond to the growing importance and demands by society similar to their colleagues in the 1970s.”
The Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule-IV (AUDADIS-IV): reliability of alcohol consumption, tobacco use, family history of depression and psychiatric diagnostic modules in a general population sample. (2003, background): “difficulties in replicating results across studies), researchers have called for incorporation of dimensional components in future nosological systems (Bashfield, 1990; Kupfer et al., 2002).”
Plate tectonics in the classification of personality disorder: shifting to a dimensional model. (2007, background): “Kupfer et al. (2002) and Rounsaville et al. (2002) lamented the failure of studies to support the validity of distinct diagnostic entities for the mood, anxiety, schizophrenia, substance use, and other classes of psychopathology.”