Renewable energy--traditional biomass vs. modern biomass

By J. Goldemberg, S. Coelho. 2004

228 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Pollution, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/03ac30623da6c7a95cdbf226bf2b16c4ee707d56

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Pollution

1. Mantu Kumar Mahalik
2. Muhammad Shahbaz
3. Khalid Ahmed
4. Ghulam Rasool
5. C. Dienst
6. Avik Sinha
7. Anis Omri
8. Ilhan Ozturk

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

1. Mantu Kumar Mahalik
2. Muhammad Shahbaz
3. Khalid Ahmed
4. Weiliang Liu
5. Ghulam Rasool
6. C. Dienst
7. E. Martinot
8. Chai Qimin

Citations in the corpus

• Considering the effect of biomass energy consumption on economic growth: Fresh evidence from BRICS region (2016, background): “In this line, Goldemberg and Coelho [27] also distinguish between ‘modern biomass’ and ‘traditional biomass’ in terms of sustainability.”
• Renewable Energy Futures: Targets, Scenarios, and Pathways (2007, background): “Some authors have advocated future targets and scenarios for “new renewables” only, excluding traditional biomass, arguing that at least a portion of traditional biomass is not “sustainable” (because it can lead to deforestation and can also be a major cause of indoor air pollution, among other thin”