Sex and Punishment: An Examination of Sexual Consequences and the Sexual Double Standard in Teen Programming

By Jennifer Stevens Aubrey. 2004

203 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Literature and Literary Theory

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/03a303726a9f1ffc451dbe356aaffa1539d65292

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

1. Kelly L. L’Engle
2. Jane D. Brown
3. R. C. Fraley
4. Michael J. Marks
5. P. Jonason
6. Paul J. Wright

In Literature and Literary Theory

1. R. C. Fraley
2. Kelly L. L’Engle
3. Jane D. Brown
4. Michael J. Marks
5. P. Jonason
6. Dave Miranda

Citations in the corpus

• Boys Will Be Boys and Girls Better Be Prepared: An Analysis of the Rare Sexual Health Messages in Young Adolescents' Media (2008, background): “A study of prime-time television programs that featured young adult characters (ages 12–22) also found that negative emotional, social, and punitive sexual consequences were more frequent when female characters initiated sexual activities (Aubrey, 2004).”
• Common vs. Uncommon Sexual Acts: Evidence for the Sexual Double Standard (2009, background): “For instance, when women in television shows engage in sexual acts, they are more often punished than men in those same shows (Aubrey 2004).”
• Confirmation Bias and the Sexual Double Standard (2006, background): “To provide a compelling example, Aubrey (2004) showed that the negative consequences of female characters’ sexual activity are overrepresented in television programming directed at adolescents, and the present results suggest that these consequences may be highly perceptible by the programs’ intende”