What decision rules might pink-footed geese use to depart on migration? An individual-based model

By O. Duriez, Silke Bauer, Anne Destin, J. Madsen, B. Nolet, R. Stillman, M. Klaassen. 2009

93 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/039d02a44c38bb426c7d42d852d0a4a69254adbc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

1. François Sarrazin

In Ecology

1. Carmen Bessa-Gomes
2. A. Gault
3. François Sarrazin
4. B. Nolet

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. Carmen Bessa-Gomes
2. A. Gault

Citations in the corpus

• Impact of food predictability on social facilitation by foraging scavengers (2010, methodology): “This approach has proved valuable in the past to model foraging behavior (e.g., Dumont and Hill 2001; GossCustard and Stillman 2008) and animal movements (e.g., Ahearn et al. 2001; Duriez et al. 2009).”
• Individually tracked geese follow peaks of temperature acceleration during spring migration (2012, methodology): “We defined RMSD values  10 days as a good fit, 10–15 days as moderate and  15 days as poor based on Duriez et al. (2009). RMSD values were calculated for each spring track (including those from the same individuals used in the between-year comparison).”