A unified statistical model of conflict onset and escalation American Journal of Political Science 4

313 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Modeling Selection Bias in Studies of Sanctions Efficacy (2002, background): “Second, given the development of a vibrant literature in international relations regarding selection bias, ignoring such issues in studies of sanctions is no longer excusable.”
An Estimator for Some Binary-Outcome Selection Models Without Exclusion Restrictions (2003, background): “A growing number of works in political science therefore use statistical procedures designed to avoid selection bias (Brehm 1993; Mitchell et al. 1997; Berinsky 1999; Reed 2000; Boehmke 2003).”
Constructing Multivariate Analyses (of Dangerous Dyads) (2005, background): “A common thread running through virtually all of the results shown in Table 2 is an emphasis on the relationship between democracy and peace. Reed (2000) is an exception.”
Causal Complexity and the Study of Politics (2003, methodology): “Tactical freedom (solidarity and autonomy) of peasants and relaxation of state coercion Peasant revolt Skocpol (1979)”
Domestic Political Accountability and the Escalation and Settlement of International Disputes (2002, methodology): “Bivariate probit is sometimes used as a method for estimating two potentially interrelated decisions of the same actor (see Reed 2000).”