The Effects of Ship Noise on Marine Mammals—A Review

By C. Erbe, S. Marley, Renée P. Schoeman, Joshua N. Smith, Leah E. Trigg, C. Embling. Frontiers in Marine Science, 2019

409 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The number of marine watercraft is on the rise—from private boats in coastal areas to commercial ships crossing oceans. A concomitant increase in underwater noise has been reported in several regions around the globe. Given the important role sound plays in the life functions of marine mammals, research on the potential effects of vessel noise has grown—in particular since the year 2000. We provide an overview of this literature, showing that studies have been patchy in terms of their coverage of species, habitats, vessel types, and types of impact investigated. The documented effects include behavioural and acoustic responses, auditory masking, and stress. We identify knowledge gaps: There appears a bias to more easily accessible species (i.e., bottlenose dolphins and humpback whales), whereas there is a paucity of literature addressing vessel noise impacts on river dolphins, even though some of these species experience chronic noise from boats. Similarly, little is known about the potential effects of ship noise on pelagic and deep-diving marine mammals, even though ship noise is focussed in a downward direction, reaching great depth at little acoustic loss and potentially coupling into sound propagation channels in which sound may transmit over long ranges. We explain the fundamental concepts involved in the generation and propagation of vessel noise and point out common problems with both physics and biology: Recordings of ship noise might be affected by unidentified artefacts, and noise exposure can be both under- and over-estimated by tens of decibel if the local sound propagation conditions are not considered. The lack of anthropogenic (e.g., different vessel types), environmental (e.g., different sea states or presence/absence of prey), and biological (e.g., different demographics) controls is a common problem, as is a lack of understanding what constitutes the ‘normal’ range of behaviours. Last but not least, the biological significance of observed responses is mostly unknown. Moving forward, standards on study design, data analysis, and reporting are badly needed so that results are comparable (across space and time) and so that data can be synthesised to address the grand unknowns: the role of context and the consequences of chronic exposures.

Subfields: Developmental Biology, Ecology, Oceanography

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0372df16a81ab7dd2363ffe06165b852f77b620d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental Biology

In Ecology

In Oceanography

Citations in the corpus

The soundscape of the Anthropocene ocean (2021, background): “Anthropogenic noise can interfere with natural auditory signal processing by marine animals, an effect termed “masking” (83), which reduces their communication space [see (84) for marine mammals, (85) for fishes].”