Marginalization of end-use technologies in energy innovation for climate protection

167 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Climate policy through changing consumption choices: Options and obstacles for reducing greenhouse gas emissions (2014, unknown): “Policies promoting innovation and deployment of low carbon technologies also tend to favor production compared to end-use energy technologies (Wilson et al., 2012).”
Reducing energy demand: A review of issues, challenges and approaches (2015, background): “These policies exist to varying degrees in different jurisdictions, but at present innovation support is strongly biased towards energy supply rather than energy demand [68].”
Beyond Technology: Demand-Side Solutions for Climate Change Mitigation (2016, background): “Although demand-side solutions are promising, they are not given the same level of attention as technological supply-side solutions in assessments, like the IPCC’s AR5, and in integrated assessment models in general, or in the popular media, as mirrored in the observation that directed innovation pe”
Reducing energy demand through low carbon innovation: A sociotechnical transitions perspective and thirteen research debates (2018, background): “Radical low carbon innovation involves cultural change: Low carbon innovations are typically less ‘sexy’ then energy supply innovations, and garner less interest from policymakers and the wider public [173].”