A memory and decision model for eyewitness identification
By S. Clark. 2003
132 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0355cfa4b7d07914e89a033d30d5354febf10fb4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Alex R. Wooten
- Michael Graham
- Chris Oriet
- C. A. Goodsell
- Scott D. Gronlund
- S. Wetmore
- J. Neuschatz
- Steve D. Charman
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Alex R. Wooten
- Michael Graham
- Chris Oriet
- C. A. Goodsell
- Scott D. Gronlund
- S. Wetmore
- J. Neuschatz
- Steve D. Charman
In Social Psychology
- Alex R. Wooten
- Michael Graham
- Chris Oriet
- C. A. Goodsell
- Scott D. Gronlund
- S. Wetmore
- J. Neuschatz
- Steve D. Charman
Citations in the corpus
- Showups versus lineups: An evaluation using ROC analysis (2012, methodology): “This was the conclusion reached by Clark (2012) and Palmer and Brewer (2012).”
- The Effect of Suspect-Filler Similarity on Eyewitness Identification Decisions: A Meta-Analysis (2013, methodology): “In more recent experiments, filler selection strategy had no effect on culprit or innocent suspect choice rates (Darling, Valentine, & Memon, 2008; Tunnicliff & Clark, 2000). To explain the absence of a match-to-description benefit in culprit identifications, Tunnicliff and Clark suggested the fille”