THE UPTAKE OF AMINO ACIDS BY MICROBES AND TREES IN THREE COLD‐TEMPERATE FORESTS

146 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The unseen majority: soil microbes as drivers of plant diversity and productivity in terrestrial ecosystems. (2008, background): “…many ecosystems, but especially in those that are strongly N limited, such as in arctic (e.g. Nordin et al. 2004) and alpine tundra (e.g. Raab et al. 1999), boreal (e.g. Nasholm et al. 1998) and temperate forest (Finzi & Berthrong 2005), and low productivity grassland (e.g. Bardgett et al. 2003).”
Do plant species with different growth strategies vary in their ability to compete with soil microbes for chemical forms of nitrogen (2008, background): “…1996; Raab et al., 1999; Henry and Jefferies, 2003; Nordin et al., 2004), boreal (Näsholm et al., 1998; Nordin et al., 2001) and temperate forest (Finzi and Berthrong, 2005), and low productivity temperate grassland (Streeter et al., 2000; Bardgett et al., 2003; Weigelt et al., 2003, 2005;…”
Microbial N immobilization is of great importance in acidified mountain spruce forest soils (2013, background): “Simple organic N molecules have been shown to be the major source of N while mineral N forms usually account for a smaller proportion of N uptake (Fierer et al., 2001; Schimel and Bennett, 2004; Finzi and Berthrong, 2005).”