How do institutions affect corruption and the shadow economy?

By Axel Dreher, Christos Kotsogiannis, S. Mccorriston. 2009

405 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/032459fcba0cbb0e70acce8db449563ad3fe19ce

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Corruption and the shadow economy: like oil and vinegar, like water and fire? (2011, neutral): “The only exception is Dreher et al. (2009) who provide empirical evidence for a negative impact of the shadow economy on corruption using a sample that comprises between 78 and 135 countries depending on the particular empirical specification.”
Shedding Light on the Shadow Economy: A Global Database and the Interaction with the Official One (2019, neutral): “consumption” approach of Kauffman and Kaliberda (1996); (iv) the “monetary transaction” approach of Feige (1979); (v) the “currency demand” approach of Cagan (1958) and others; and (vi) the “Multiple Indicators, Multiple Causes” (MIMIC).”
Shadow Economies and Corruption All Over the World: Revised Estimates for 120 Countries (2007, background): “Consequently, an increase in the shadow economy always decreases the size of the official market.”
Consumer Expenditures and Home Production at Retirement – New Evidence from Germany (2007, methodology): “In addition to the survey studies by Enste and Schneider (2006), Feld and Larsen (2005, 2008, 2010) and Merz and Wolff (1993) for Germany, the survey method has also been applied in the Nordic countries and Great Britain (Isachsen and Str m, 1985; Pedersen, 2003) as well as in the Netherlands (Kazem”
How Does Corruption Affect Public Debt? An Empirical Analysis (2017, background): “Dreher et al. (2008) similarly, show that an improvement in institutional quality reduces the shadow economy directly and corruption both directly and indirectly by influencing the shadow market.”
Estimating the Size of the Shadow Economy: Methods, Problems and Open Questions (2013, neutral): “18) See Thomas (1992, 1999), Feige (1986), Pozo (1996), Pedersen (2003) and Ahumada et al.”
CAUSES AND EFFECTS OF CORRUPTION: WHAT HAS PAST DECADE'S EMPIRICAL RESEARCH TAUGHT US? A SURVEY (2018, positive): “An early study created a model that suggested that corruption and shadow markets are substitutes (Choi and Thum, 2005), this received support in a later paper that re-examined the relationship (Dreher et al., 2009).”