The Worth of a Possum: Valuing Species with the Contingent Valuation Method

By K. Jakobsson, A. Dragun. 2001

133 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Are There Income Effects on Global Willingness to Pay for Biodiversity Conservation? (2009, result): “This observation is from a study regarding preservation of both a number of species and a specific species ( Jakobsson and Dragun 2001 ), and the difference in the estimates in the original study seems”
Estimating the non-market benefits of an urban park: Does proximity matter? (2007, background): “18As noted by Jakobsson and Dragun (2001), a key question is whether values should be aggregated over individuals or over households.”
Valuing cultural heritage: the social benefits of restoring and old Arab tower (2005, background): “Firstly, as noted by Jakobsson and Dragun [45], a key question is whether values should be aggregated over individuals or over households.”
What’s in a name? The use of quantitative measures versus ‘Iconised’ species when valuing biodiversity (2008, background): “Jakobsson and Dragun 2001; Lehtonen et al. 2003).”
Protest response and willingness to pay for culturally significant urban trees: Implications for Contingent Valuation Method (2015, background): “This non-traditional procedure, pioneered by Jorgensen and Syme (2000) and Meyerhoff and Liebe (2006), was premised upon the assumption that positive WTPs and protest responses are not mutually exclusive.”