Phonation types in production of phonological tone: the case of Green Mong

By Jean E. Andruski, M. Ratliff. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 2000

95 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics, Physiology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/02ebcaf21f5cbd3367bb232ba8a1e71c4d3dd124

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. J. Costello
2. Patricia A. Keating
3. Jean E. Andruski

In Language and Linguistics

1. J. Costello
2. Patricia A. Keating
3. Jean E. Andruski

In Physiology

1. J. Costello
2. Patricia A. Keating
3. Jean E. Andruski

Citations in the corpus

• Using polynomial equations to model pitch contour shape in lexical tones: an example from Green Mong (2004, methodology): “Andruski & Ratliff (2000) used Mels in the original study.”
• The acoustic consequences of phonation and tone interactions in Jalapa Mazatec (2010, background): “…ratio, jitter, and shimmer measures) to differentiate a variety of phonation types such as breathy, glottalized, and epiglottalized voices, e.g. Andruski & Ratliff (2000) and Andruski (2006) on Mong; Blankenship (2002) on Mazatec, Chong, and Mpi; Wayland & Jongman (2003) on Khmer; Avelino…”
• Linguistic Voice Quality (2006, background): “For example, Andruski & Ratliff (2000) report very good results from a discriminant analysis of 3 Mong tones using 15 predictors.”