The relationships between body mass and body image and relative autonomy for exercise among adolescent males and females

By D. Markland, D. Ingledew. 2007

145 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/02eaa37f14a11646fce54506489b2f500f72b34e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Nikos Ntoumanis
2. Alison L. Smith
3. S. Vlachopoulos
4. C. Lonsdale
5. K. Hodge
6. J. Ng
7. J. Duda
8. M. Standage

In Clinical Psychology

1. C. Lonsdale
2. K. Hodge
3. S. Vlachopoulos
4. Nikos Ntoumanis
5. Alison L. Smith

In Social Psychology

1. C. Lonsdale
2. K. Hodge
3. S. Vlachopoulos
4. Nikos Ntoumanis
5. Alison L. Smith
6. J. Ng
7. M. Standage
8. Martin S. Hagger

Citations in the corpus

• The Basic Needs Satisfaction in Sport Scale (BNSSS) : instrument development and initial validity evidence (2011, background): “For example, Gagné et al. (2003) used the formula 2% IMþ 1% IDþ ($1)% IJþ ($2)% EX, while Markland and Ingledew (2007) employed 3% IMþ 2% IGþ 1% IDþ ($1)% IJþ ($2)% EXþ ($3)%AM.”
• The basic psychological needs in exercise scale: Translation and evidence for cross‐cultural validity (2010, methodology): “The weights applied to each regulation were as follow: amo-tivation −3; external regulation −2; introjected regulation −1; identified regulation +2; intrinsic regulation +3 (Markland & Ingledew, 2007).”