“The Stippling Shows Statistically Significant Grid Points”: How Research Results are Routinely Overstated and Overinterpreted, and What to Do about It
By D. Wilks. 2016
692 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/02d6f44a00b2e55867fc0feab6f6be0e5874cf9c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
In Statistics and Probability
Citations in the corpus
- Agricultural Drought Prediction Based on Conditional Distributions of Vine Copulas (2021, methodology): “Figure 3 shows the 1–2-months lag Kendall correlation coefficient (τk) (the false discovery rate (FDR; Wilks, 2016) procedure is used to correct τk at a 0.”
- Testing for differences between two distributions in the presence of serial correlation using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov and Kuiper's tests (2021, background): “…should be noted that although this work deals only with the effects of temporal coherence, once local (e.g., gridpoint or station) significance has been established by appropriate means, recent advances allow for addressing the problem of spatial coherence in a straightforward manner (Wilks, 2016).”
- Neural networks for post-processing ensemble weather forecasts (2018, methodology): “Following suggestions of Wilks (2016) we apply a Benjamini and Hochberg (1995) procedure to control the false discovery rate at level α .”