Nutrition, ecology and nutritional ecology: toward an integrated framework
By David Raubenheimer, Stephen J. Simpson, D. Mayntz. 2009
586 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Forestry, Insect Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/02c94a13b1dbd0a3b0f37eb649e880668a28c601
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- David Raubenheimer
- R. Wrangham
- Stephen J. Simpson
- William Foley
- A. Felton
- A. Felton
- David B. Lindenmayer
- Kendall D. Clements
In Forestry
- David Raubenheimer
- Kendall D. Clements
- JH Choat
- Stephen J. Simpson
- Albert Rivas‐Ubach
- Josep Peñuelas
- David B. Lindenmayer
- R. Wrangham
In Insect Science
- David Raubenheimer
- Stephen J. Simpson
- K. Lee
- Kendall D. Clements
- JH Choat
- A. Felton
- David B. Lindenmayer
- William Foley
Citations in the corpus
- Macronutrient optimization and energy maximization determine diets of brown bears (2014, background): “The study of macronutrient balancing has been revolutionized by using the geometric framework proposed by Raubenheimer et al. (2009) in which nutrient targets (i.e., nonrandom combinations of macronutrients that confer a functional advantage over other combinations) can be identified and the…”
- The elemental stoichiometry of aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems and its relationships with organismic lifestyle and ecosystem structure and function: a review and perspectives (2011, background): “…al. 2008a, b), skeleton building in fish (Hendrixson et al. 2007) and investment in storage tissues and N-rich chemical defenses such as some N-rich alkaloids like nicotine (Raubenheimer et al. 2009; Van der Stap et al. 2007) must also be considered in studies of the causes and consequences of C:N”
- The Multidimensional Stoichiometric Niche (2017, background): “…and Villéger, 2015; Swanson et al., 2015), the geometric framework of nutrition (Simpson and Raubenheimer, 1993; Raubenheimer and Simpson, 2004; Raubenheimer et al., 2009, 2015; Kearney et al., 2010; Raubenheimer, 2011), and ecological stoichiometry (Elser et al., 2000; Peñuelas et al., 2008,…”
- Nutritional toxicology of mammals: regulated intake of plant secondary compounds (2009, background): “In contrast, the occurrence of PSCs in food necessitates the metabolism of these compounds by biotransformation enzymes to reduce their harmful effects, and thus, animals may need to halt food intake prior to meeting energy demands (see also Raubenheimer et al. 2009).”
- The nature of nutrition: a unifying framework (2011, methodology): “…patterns of resource exploitation in foraging animals (Oom et al. 2004; Grimm and Railsback 2005; Nonaka and Holme 2007), but they have yet to take account of multiple nutrient dimensions; in otherwords, they are not yet nutritionally explicit (Raubenheimer et al. 2009; Simpson et al. 2010).”
- Nutritional ecology of marine herbivorous fishes: ten years on (2009, methodology): “Simple elemental ratios used in stoichiometric studies can be inadequate also because availability and utilization are influenced by the biochemical composition of the diet (Anderson et al. 2004; Raubenheimer et al. 2008).”
- Nutritional goals of wild primates (2009, background): “One means by which all three levels of inquiry can be assessed, and hypotheses tested without a priori assumptions, is the Geometric Framework for nutrition (Raubenheimer & Simpson 2004; Simpson et al. 2004; Simpson & Raubenheimer 2005; Raubenheimer et al. 2009).”
- The Evolution of Animal Nuptial Gifts (2012, background): “# In considering selection for nutritive nuptial gifts, the geometric framework developed for nutritional ecology (Raubenheimer, 2011; Raubenheimer et al., 2009) provides a powerful tool for testing whether male gifts evolved to support female reproduction.”
- Comparative Feeding Ecology of Two Communities of Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) in Kibale National Park, Uganda (2011, background): “Also, it is clear that equating the percentage of ripe fruit in the diet with dietary quality is an oversimplification (Raubenheimer et al. 2009).”