Investigation of benchmark model for estimating iron loss in rotating machine
By H. Domeki, Y. Ishihara, C. Kaido, Y. Kawase, S. Kitamura, T. Shimomura, N. Takahashi, T. Yamada, K. Yamazaki. IEEE transactions on magnetics, 2004
138 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Mechanical Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/02c567ff397b595dcb67f03178be0fc281d8af0c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Electrical and Electronic Engineering
In Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
Citations in the corpus
- Computation of Core Losses in Electrical Machines Using Improved Models for Laminated Steel (2006, background): “…it has become more apparent that, to improve the accuracy of a material model that is based on the Steinmez equation or on a modified form of it, some variability of the core-loss coefficients has to be allowed, examples including a polynomial representation of the hysteresis loss power…”
- Comparison of Coaxial Magnetic Gears With Different Topologies (2009, methodology): “So, the use of FEM to evaluate the iron losses of the two CMGs is adopted [9].”
- On the variation with flux and frequency of the core loss coefficients in electrical machines (2006, background): “(The terminology of core loss, rather than iron loss, and induction, rather than flux density, follows the relevant ASTM standards [15].)”
- Iron loss analysis of interior permanent-magnet synchronous motors-variation of main loss factors due to driving condition (2006, background): “Note that the reaction field caused by the eddy currents in the stator and the rotor is neglected in the calculation because it can be regarded as small compared with the main field produced by the armature current and magnet.”