The ecology and evolution of induced resistance against herbivores

By R. Karban. 2011

474 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/02c2768fde98685878748715137cbd593ee84923

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Insect Science

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

The resource availability hypothesis revisited: a meta‐analysis (2011, background): “Functional Ecology 2010 British Ecological Society, Functional Ecology, 25, 389–398 inducing production of defences (Karban & Myers 1989; Karban 2011).”
Evolutionary ecology of plant defences against herbivores (2011, background): “Here, Karban (2011) reviews progress since his influential book and highlights questions that remain unresolved.”
Ecological and evolutionary implications of plant tolerance to herbivory (2011, background): “induced resistance) that determines the nutritional phenotype of damaged plants (Karban 2011).”
Elevational gradients in plant defences and insect herbivory: recent advances in the field and prospects for future research (2018, background): “However, other strategies such as tolerance (e.g. re-growth capacity or overcompensation in reproduction; Carmona et al. 2011), induced defences (Karban 2011), and indirect defences (i.e. plant traits that facilitate the recruitment of natural enemies of insect herbivores; Kessler and Heil 2011)…”
Current trends in the evolutionary ecology of plant defence (2011, background): “Although the study of induced resistance has exploded in the past 20 years, many unanswered questions remain (Karban 2011).”
The ecology and evolution of induced responses to herbivory and how plants perceive risk (2019, background): “The oldest and best-studied explanation for induced defences is that defences are costly and plants can save these costs when defences are not needed (Rhoades, 1979; Karban, 2011).”
The multiple faces of indirect defences and their agents of natural selection (2011, background): “…growth and the production of secondary metabolites in the cultivated forms (Benrey et al. 1998; Ballhorn et al. 2008), despite the common but rarely tested hypothesis that costly resistance traits tend to be lost when relieved from natural selection during the domestication process (Karban 2011).”
Mechanisms of plant defense against insect herbivores (2012, background): “The HIPVs mediate the interactions between plants and arthropods, microorganisms, undamaged neighboring plants, or intraplant signaling that warns undamaged sites within the plant.(8,10) Depending upon the modes of feeding of insect pests, different defense signaling pathways are activated, which in”