Resource Curse: New Evidence on the Role of Institutions

By T. Sarmidi, Siong Hook Law, Y. Jafari. 2014

136 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Building and Construction, Development, Economics and Econometrics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/02bde03829c38135ed2021ae7673851a9e2da790

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Building and Construction

1. E. Papyrakis
2. Muhammad Shahbaz
3. Jeremy Clark
4. Ramez Abubakr Badeeb
5. Hooi Hooi Lean
6. E. Gilberthorpe
7. Atsushi Iimi

In Development

1. Jeremy Clark
2. E. Papyrakis
3. Ramez Abubakr Badeeb
4. Muhammad Shahbaz
5. Hooi Hooi Lean
6. E. Gilberthorpe

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Muhammad Shahbaz
2. Nanthakumar Loganathan
3. Hooi Hooi Lean
4. E. Papyrakis
5. E. Gilberthorpe
6. Ramez Abubakr Badeeb
7. Jeremy Clark
8. Abdul Farooq

Citations in the corpus

• Empirical evidence on the resource curse hypothesis in oil abundant economy (2014, background): “3 For details see Shahbaz et al. (2011). 4 If the variables are integrated at I(0) then we compare our calculated F-statistic with lower critical bound to make decisions whether cointegration exists between the series or not otherwise we use upper critical bounds if the variables are integrated at I”
• The evolution of the natural resource curse thesis: A critical literature survey (2017, background): “Similarly, Sarmidi et al. (2014) argue that as institutional quality improves, the negative effect of resource abundance on growth should dissipate.”
• The extractive industries and development: The resource curse at the micro, meso and macro levels (2015, background): “Rather than trying to explain any variability in institutions as a result of mineral abundance, it instead emphasises the mediating role of good institutions in preventing the resource curse (Boschini et al., 2007; Kolstad, 2009; Mehlum et al., 2006; Sarmidi et al., 2014).”