Where did interpretivism go in the theory of entrepreneurship

By Mark D. Packard. 2017

129 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Business and International Management, Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/02b480d852f10aeb722950162a0689f03cde3be8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Business and International Management

1. N. J. Foss
2. Christian Bjørnskov
3. Alistair R. Anderson
4. Peter G. Klein
5. Johan Gaddefors

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. N. J. Foss
2. Christian Bjørnskov
3. Peter G. Klein
4. Johan Gaddefors
5. Alistair R. Anderson
6. David Urbano
7. Dimo Dimov
8. Jeffery S. McMullen

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Johan Gaddefors
2. Christian Bjørnskov
3. Alistair R. Anderson
4. Peter G. Klein
5. N. J. Foss
6. S. Müller
7. Sarah L. Jack
8. D. Goss

Citations in the corpus

• The Context of Entrepreneurial Judgment: Organizations, Markets, and Institutions (2019, background): “In contrast, coming (partly) out of the Austrian economics tradition, the judgment-based approach takes seriously the role of subjective interpretation of individuals, events, and resources (Packard, 2017).”
• Romancing the rural: Reconceptualizing rural entrepreneurship as engagement with context(s) (2018, background): “ Interestingly  and referring to our opening about rural entrepreneurship scholarship as European, Packard (2017),  seems to have rediscovered interpretivism in the US.”