The Fate of the First Galaxies. II. Effects of Radiative Feedback

By M. Ricotti, Nickolay Y. Gnedin, J. Michael Shull. 2001

165 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We use three-dimensional cosmological simulations with radiative transfer to study the formation and evolution of the first galaxies in a ΛCDM cosmology. The simulations include continuum radiative transfer using the optically thin variable Eddington tensor (OTVET) approximation and line radiative transfer in the H2 Lyman-Werner bands of the UV background radiation. Chemical and thermal processes are treated in detail, particularly the ones relevant for H2 formation and destruction. We find that the first luminous objects ("small-halo objects") are characterized by bursting star formation (SF) that is self-regulated by a feedback process acting on cosmological instead of galactic scales. The global SF history is regulated by the mean number of ionizing photons that escape from each source, ϵUV⟨fesc⟩. It is almost independent of the assumed SF efficiency parameter, ϵ*, and the intensity of the dissociating background. The main feedback process that regulates the SF is the reformation of H2 in front of H II regions and inside relic H II regions. The H II regions remain confined inside filaments, maximizing the production of H2 in overdense regions through cyclic destruction/reformation of H2. If ϵUV⟨fesc⟩ > 10-7/ϵ*, the SF is self-regulated, photoevaporation of small-halo objects dominates the metal pollution of the low-density intergalactic medium, and the mass of produced metals depends only on ⟨fesc⟩. If ϵUV⟨fesc⟩ ≲ 10-7/ϵ*, positive feedback dominates, and small-halo objects constitute the bulk of the mass in stars and metals until at least redshift z ~ 10. Small-halo objects cannot reionize the universe because the feedback mechanism confines the H II regions inside the large-scale structure filaments. In contrast to massive objects ("large halos"), which can reionize voids, small-halo objects partially ionize only the dense filaments while leaving the voids mostly neutral.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0299f704d95ed2e6d8ccb3c5f2dd4b9b85a11892

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. Volker Bromm
  2. Tom Abel
  3. L. Hernquist
  4. John H. Wise
  5. A. Ferrara
  6. S. Glover
  7. P. Hopkins
  8. Jarrett L. Johnson

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

  1. Jeremiah P. Ostriker
  2. M. Ricotti
  3. Tom Abel
  4. L. Hernquist
  5. Naoki Yoshida
  6. Nickolay Y. Gnedin
  7. Volker Bromm
  8. A. Mesinger

In Instrumentation

  1. L. Hernquist
  2. P. Hopkins
  3. Tom Abel
  4. Jeremiah P. Ostriker
  5. Volker Bromm
  6. Volker Springel
  7. John H. Wise
  8. Naoki Yoshida

Citations in the corpus