Development and testing of phenologically driven grizzly bear habitat models

By Scott E. Nielsen, M. Boyce, Gordon B. Stenhouse, Robin Munro. 2003

154 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0292e0066218a89a082fe49b036cc3c834ca0d84

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

In Ecology

Citations in the corpus

Quantifying Grizzly Bear Selection of Natural and Anthropogenic Edges (2013, background): “Grizzly bears use an array of habitats throughout the year because of seasonally dynamic food values (Nielsen et al. 2003, Munro et al. 2006).”
Evolutionary and ecological traps for brown bears Ursus arctos in human‐modified landscapes (2018, background): “In the absence of humans, consuming high- energy berries benefits bears’ fitness (Welch et al. 1997, McLellan 2011, McLellan 2015), thus berries are attractive for them (McLellan and Hovey 2001, Nielsen et al. 2003, Nielsen et al. 2010).”
Scat detection dogs in wildlife research and management: application to grizzly and black bears in the Yellowhead ecosystem, Alberta, Canada (2004, background): “Although more data are needed that take into account differences in habitat quality between these areas (e.g., Nielsen et al. 2002, 2003), the above results could suggest that bears may re- spond differently to varying levels and forms of human use, independent of habitat quality.”
A habitat-based framework for grizzly bear conservation in Alberta (2006, unknown): “…bear habitats have relied on radiotelemetry analyses of habitat selection (Waller and Mace, 1997; Mace et al., 1996, 1999; McLellan and Hovey, 2001; Nielsen et al., 2002, 2003) or assessments of occupancy based on field surveys and published records (Naves et al., 2003; Posillico et al., 2004).”
ANIMAL HABITAT QUALITY AND ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONING: EXPLORING SEASONAL PATTERNS USING NDVI (2008, methodology): “…the analysis of local species–environment relationships is the use of statistical models relating the distribution of species or communities to ‘‘static’’ environmental variables such as land cover (Mladenoff et al. 1995, Schadt et al. 2002), or topography (Hirzel et al. 2002, Nielsen et al. 2003).”
Grizzly bears and forestry II. Distribution of grizzly bear foods in clearcuts of west-central Alberta, Canada (2004, background): “Previous food modeling efforts have focused on protected mountainous ecosystems like Yellowstone (Mattson, 2000) or Jasper (Nielsen et al., 2003) National Parks, where forest harvesting does not occur and populations are generally considered secure.”