Comment: On Respondent-Driven Sampling and Snowball Sampling in Hard-to-Reach Populations and Snowball Sampling Not in Hard-to-Reach Populations

By L. A. Goodman. 2011

276 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Epidemiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/02904fa03c9a26977649317a020fc40e971ee3b7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Epidemiology

1. Douglas D. Heckathorn
2. L. A. Goodman
3. Matthew J. Salganik
4. Carter T. Butts
5. Krista Gile
6. Amber Tomas
7. Erik M. Volz
8. G. Bauer

In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

1. Douglas D. Heckathorn
2. L. A. Goodman
3. Carter T. Butts
4. Matthew J. Salganik
5. Krista Gile
6. Erik M. Volz
7. G. Bauer
8. Amber Tomas

In Statistics and Probability

1. Douglas D. Heckathorn

Citations in the corpus

• SNOWBALL VERSUS RESPONDENT-DRIVEN SAMPLING (2011, background): “…provided a useful service with his clarification of the differences among snowball sampling as originally introduced by Coleman (1958–1959) and Goodman (1961) as a means for studying the structure of social networks; snowball sampling as a convenience method for studying hard-to-reach…”