Identifying the Disadvantaged: Official Poverty, Consumption Poverty, and the New Supplemental Poverty Measure
By Bruce D. Meyer, James X. Sullivan. 2012
230 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/02658c689a36e775f94850021be0c7ff02aaa55e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Gender Studies
- H. Hoynes
- Bruce D. Meyer
- M. Bitler
- James X. Sullivan
- Nathaniel Hendren
- M. Bils
- Mark Aguiar
- Alisha Coleman-Jensen
In Sociology and Political Science
- James X. Sullivan
- Bruce D. Meyer
- H. Hoynes
- Munseob Lee
- David Argente
- M. Bils
- Mark Aguiar
- Chuanchuan Zhang
Citations in the corpus
- Consumption and Income Inequality and the Great Recession (2013, background): “In addition to these conceptual arguments, there is empirical evidence that consumption provides a better measure of well-being than income (Meyer and Sullivan 2011, 2012).”
- The More Things Change, the More They Stay the Same? The Safety Net and Poverty in the Great Recession (2016, background): “Meyer and Sullivan ð2012Þ,Wimer et al. ð2013Þ, and Fox et al. ð2015Þ createmeasures of either income ðWimer et al. 2013; Fox et al. 2015Þ or consumption ðMeyer and Sullivan 2012Þ poverty that aim to improve on official poverty.”