Biooptical characteristics of PSII and PSI in 33 species (13 pigment groups) of marine phytoplankton, and the relevance for pulse‐amplitude‐modulated and fast‐repetition‐rate fluorometry 1

202 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Interpretation of fast repetition rate (FRR) fluorescence: signatures of phytoplankton community structure versus physiological state (2009, methodology): “Until the development of FRR, active fluorometry typically only measured Fv/Fm and so had to rely on independent measurements of light absorption to calculate PET rates in absolute terms (Kromkamp & Forster 2003, Johnsen & Sakshaug 2007).”
Pigments and photoacclimation processes (2011, background): “The interpretation of light harvesting pigments and PPC in HL and LL conditions is therefore highly dependent on biomass normalization (chla vs. POC, Rodriguez et al., 2006; Johnsen and Sakshaug, 2007).”
Taxonomic Discrimination of Phytoplankton by Spectral Fluorescence (2010, background): “The peak wavelength can vary by 10 nm or more (Millie et al. 2002; Johnsen and Sakshaug 2007), which has been ascribed to differences in pigment-protein binding between taxa.”
Photoacclimation processes in phytoplankton: mechanisms, consequences, and applications (2009, background): “However, phytoplankton species differ in this respect (Johnsen & Sakshaug 2007), and may be grouped into Chlorella versus Skeletonema types by the range of their change in chlorophyll content (Talling 1957).”