Teaching Entrepreneurship: A Practice-Based Approach
By Heidi M. Neck, P. Greene, C. Brush. 2014
226 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/024fe18982f0d69248c6aa9b688342b1e8385c98
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- Michael H. Morris
- Susana C. Santos
- Xaver Neumeyer
- D. Kuratko
- Martin Lackéus
- J. Hornsby
- James C. Hayton
- David B. Audretsch
Citations in the corpus
- Comparing the impact of three different experiential approaches to entrepreneurship in education (2020, background): “Students can be asked to: (1) start a real-life business venture (Ollila andWilliams-Middleton, 2011); (2) start a simulated mini-company (Dwerryhouse, 2001; European Commission, 2005); (3) start a social venture (Rae, 2010; Young, 2014); (4) write a business plan (Honig, 2004; Neck et al., 2014); (”
- Entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurial intention: Do female students benefit? (2016, unknown): “Future EE for women (and men), for example, could encourage practice-based learning (Neck et al., 2014) relating to the accumulation of bricolage and effectuation skills, particularly in resource-”
- Examining the Future Trajectory of Entrepreneurship (2018, background): “Experiential learning, or what Neck, Greene, and Brush (2014) term “deliberate practice,” can take a wide variety of forms.”
- Entrepreneurship Education in a Poverty Context: An Empowerment Perspective (2019, background): “Students engage in “deliberate practice,” immersed in real-world situations as they achieve meaningful performances that help attain a state of mind (Neck, Greene, and Brush 2014).”
- Expanding entrepreneurship education ecosystems (2017, unknown): “…entrepreneurial education being action-based, entrepreneurship culture, university-industry-government partnership, regulation and institutions for knowledge commercialisation are likely to be more resilient and achieve higher efficiency (Etzkowitz and Leydesdorff, 2000; Neck et al. 2014).”