The Foundations of Psychoanalysis

By A. Grünbaum. 2019

144 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Philosophy

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/02480f721af2d275ec8c832b854612e32e0a6b64

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. P. Granqvist
2. B. Hagekull
3. Jon Mills

In Philosophy

1. P. Granqvist
2. B. Hagekull
3. Jon Mills

Citations in the corpus

• A Critique of Relational Psychoanalysis. (2005, background): “Popper (1972) and Grünbaum (1984) argue that psychoanalysis simply fails as a natural science because it is too private, not open to clinical testing or falsification, and not modeled after physics, while Sulloway (1979) and Webster (1995) decry that it must forgo the status of a serious science bec”
• Seeking security in the New Age: On attachment and emotional compensation (2001, methodology): “These items were drawn from the three retrospective attachment paragraphs proposed by Hazan and Shaver (1986), but were subjected to splitting into theoretically derived multi-item average scales to subject the measures to homogeneity evaluations, as well as to increase measurement precision (Granqv”