Assessing Static and Dynamic Influences on Inmate Violence Levels

By Benjamin M Steiner. 2009

97 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0247abec35c7e4f341e868afbfbc478897540e86

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

1. Benjamin M Steiner
2. J. Wooldredge
3. H. Butler
4. Jared M. Ellison

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Benjamin M Steiner
2. J. Wooldredge
3. H. Butler
4. Jared M. Ellison
5. Shelley Johnson Listwan

Citations in the corpus

• Causes and correlates of prison inmate misconduct: A systematic review of the evidence (2014, background): “Macro level processes related to administrative (formal) or non-administrative (informal) controls at the prison level (Colvin, 1992; DiIulio, 1987; Steiner, 2009; Useem & Kimball, 1989; Useem & Reisig, 1999), as well as environmental conditions which influence control structures (Steiner, 2009; Use”
• Comparing Self-Report to Official Measures of Inmate Misconduct (2014, background): “Also, higher security facilities typically maintain higher levels of supervision; but these facilities also house more inmates at higher risk for engaging in misconduct (Griffin & Hepburn, 2006; Steiner, 2009).”
• Victimization, Social Support, and Psychological Well-Being (2010, background): “Other research has found that staff and inmates’ race (McCorkle, Meithe, & Drass, 1995; Steiner, 2009) and age (Mabli, Holley, Patrick, & Walls, 1979) and inmates’ housing types (Huebner, 2003) and lifestyles are significant predictors of prison violence (Wooldredge, 1998).”