A Nash-Moser theorem for singular evolution equations. Application to the Serre and Green-Naghdi equations
By Borys Álvarez-Samaniego, David Lannes. 2007
97 citations recorded by the source corpus.
We study the well-posedness of the initial value problem for a wide class of singular evolution equations. We prove a general well-posedness theorem under three assumptions easy to check: the first controls the singular part of the equation, the second the behavior of the nonlinearities, and the third one assumes that an energy estimate can be found for the linearized system. We allow losses of derivatives in this energy estimate and therefore construct a solution by a Nash-Moser iterative scheme. As an application to this general theorem, we prove the well-posedness of the Serre and Green-Naghdi equation and discuss the problem of their validity as asymptotic models for the water-waves equations.
Subfields: Applied Mathematics, Control and Systems Engineering, Mathematical Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/022cc84ea987d5d9e2331546037a9f60c96a1713
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Mathematics
- Borys Álvarez-Samaniego
- David Lannes
- Adrian Constantin
- Jean-Claude Saut
- Yue Liu
- Thomas Alazard
- Zhaoyang Yin
- Yong Zhou
In Control and Systems Engineering
In Mathematical Physics
- David Lannes
- Borys Álvarez-Samaniego
- Adrian Constantin
- Yue Liu
- Jonatan Lenells
- Zhaoyang Yin
- Yong Zhou
- Thomas Alazard
Citations in the corpus
- Large time existence for 3D water-waves and asymptotics (2007, methodology): “on 5.1 some simple sufficient conditions on the initial data and the bottom parameterization bwhich ensure that it is satisfied. Remark 5.4. Onealso hasthefollowing stability property(see Corollary 1 in [2]): let T>0 and (Upapp)p∈P = (ζ app p ,ψ app p )p∈P, bounded in Ys+P T (see Definition 4.2), be ”
- The Hydrodynamical Relevance of the Camassa–Holm and Degasperis–Procesi Equations (2007, result): “Proof. The first point of the theorem is a direct consequence of Proposition 4. Thanks to Proposition 2, we now that (u e,µ ,ζ e,µ )e,µ is consistent with the Green‐ Naghdi equations (3), so that the second point of the theorem and the error estimate follow at once from the well-posedness and stabil”