Estimating population size by spatially explicit capture–recapture

298 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Wildlife in a Politically Divided World: Insularism Inflates Estimates of Brown Bear Abundance (2016, methodology): “Our study illustrates how spatially explicit CR models (Efford & Fewster 2013; Royle et al. 2013) can account for detection of “foreign residents” in abundance/density estimation models, even when monitoring data from neighboring jurisdictions are unavailable or study design does not conform to…”
Effects of low-level culling of feral cats in open populations: a case study from the forests of southern Tasmania (2015, background): “This may also have facilitated spatially explicit capture–mark–recapture analyses, which have been used for other rare and cryptic carnivores (Efford and Fewster 2013), but that require greater recapture rates of the same individuals between different survey devices than we were able to achieve.”