Global Warming Potentials: 2. Accuracy
By Steven J. Smith, T. Wigley. 2000
71 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/021aaf80960595e52591ac7a38cc066f912e73fa
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Atmospheric Science
In Economics and Econometrics
- Richard S. J. Tol
- Felix Creutzig
- M. Delucchi
- David Anthoff
- Gary W. Yohe
- Yi Yang
- Francesco Bosello
- Partha Dasgupta
In Global and Planetary Change
- Richard S. J. Tol
- Felix Creutzig
- M. Delucchi
- David Anthoff
- Chris Hope
- Gary W. Yohe
- Partha Dasgupta
- Claudia Kemfert
Citations in the corpus
- Using Attributional Life Cycle Assessment to Estimate Climate‐Change Mitigation Benefits Misleads Policy Makers (2014, background): “It is important to recognize that there is a vigorous debate over the appropriateness of using GWPs to estimate climate impacts (Tol et al. 2012; Manning and Reisinger 2011; Shine 2009; Smith and Wigley 2000a; Smith and Wigley 2000b; Delucchi 2011a).”
- Multi-Gas Emission Reduction for Climate Change Policy: An Application of Fund (2006, background): “This is the set of equivalences accepted by the UNFCCC, but it is now widely acknowledged that GWPs have limited validity in the natural sciences (Smith and Wigley, 2000a,b), and no validity in economics or policy (Reilly and Richards, 1993; Schmalensee, 1993; Kandlikar, 1995, 1996; Hammitt et al.…”