The functional logic of cortico-pulvinar connections.

By S. Shipp. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2003

398 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0218c16c1bacb283a4f830d8716af1a607a1af73

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

Citations in the corpus

Exploring the Thalamus and its Role in Cortical Function, S.M. Sherman, R.W. Guillery (Eds.). The MIT Press (2006), ISBN: 0-262-19532-1 (2007, background): “They have been identified by different terms (Updyke, 1983; Shipp, 2003) but will here be called isocortical columns (Guillery et al.”
Feedforward, feedback and inhibitory connections in primate visual cortex (2004, background): “And the relatively precise and systematic organization of connections to and from the cortex and pulvinar (see (Shipp, 2003) for review) suggest that these connections are likely to mediate relatively direct interactions between cortical areas.”
Emotional perception: Meta-analyses of face and natural scene processing (2011, background): “It receives input from visual cortex (e.g.: V1 and extrastriate cortex) and is connected with the prefrontal cortex, posterior parietal cortex, and superior colliculus (Shipp, 2003).”
Neuronal Synchrony in Complex-Valued Deep Networks (2013, background): “It is possible that there are dedicated structures in the brain, such as the pulvinar in the thalamus, that coordinate cross-cortical processing and cortical rhythms (e.g. Shipp, 2003; Saalmann et al., 2012).”
The effects of electrical microstimulation on cortical signal propagation (2010, background): “In fact, it has been suggested that there is a 'replicating' cortico-pulvinar-cortical linkag”
Neural Elements for Predictive Coding (2016, background): “…coordinate the gain of ascending pathways through direct effects upon superficial error units, or by regulation of effective connectivity through the induction of coherence in transareal oscillatory relationships (Shipp, 2003; Purushothaman et al., 2012; Saalmann et al., 2012; Kanai et al., 2015).”
2007 Special Issue: Consciousness CLEARS the mind (2007, neutral): “links attentive learning requirements to how laminar neocortical circuits interact with primary, higher-order (e.g., the pulvinar nucleus; Sherman and Guillery, 2001; Shipp, 2003), and nonspecific thalamic nuclei (van Der Werf et al.”
Adaptive Resonance Theory: How a brain learns to consciously attend, learn, and recognize a changing world (2013, background): “…requirements into a hierarchy of laminar neocortical circuits interacting with first-order (e.g., LGN) and higher-order (e.g., the pulvinar nucleus; Sherman and Guillery (2001) and Shipp (2003)) specific thalamic nuclei, and nonspecific thalamic nuclei (van Der Werf, Witter, & Groenewegen, 2002).”
Emotion processing and the amygdala: from a ‘low road’ to ‘many roads’ of evaluating biological significance (2010, neutral): “For example, all 20–30 known visual areas connect with the pulvinar, sometimes in a relatively topographic fashio”
Functional Specialization in the Attention Network (2019, background): “Directly connected cortical areas are generally indirectly connected via the pulvinar, through cortico-thalamo-cortical pathways (Sherman et al. 2006, Shipp 2003).”