Globalization, regional wage differentials and the Stolper-Samuelson Theorem: Evidence from Mexico

By Daniel Chiquiar. 2004

252 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/020ce045f53a11e5f2685ad386f684c321768f5b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

The Impact of Trade on Inequality in Developing Countries (2017, unknown): “…concentration of industries benefiting from lower export costs or increased demand for their exports experience higher earnings than individuals in less exposed regions (McCaig 2011 for Vietnam; Costa, Garred and Pessoa 2016 for Brazil; Chiquiar 2008 for Mexico; Erten and Leight 2017 for China).”
New Frontiers: The Origins and Content of New Work, 1940–2018 (2022, background): “40Related work maps trade shocks to labor market outcomes in Brazil, Canada, India, Norway, Germany, Mexico, and other countries (Balsvik et al., 2015; Branstetter et al., 2019; Chiquiar, 2008; Dauth et al., 2014; Devlin et al., 2021; Kovak, 2013; Topalova, 2010).”
Does economic globalisation affect income inequality? A meta‐analysis (2020, background): “…the effect of trade globalisation: while several papers find (partial) empirical support for the Stolper-Samuelson theorem (e.g. Robertson 2004; Chiquiar 2008; Roser and Crespo Cuaresma 2016), others reject it based on econometric hypothesis tests (e.g. Goldberg and Pavncik 2007; Meschi and…”
Exporting Out of Poverty: Provincial Poverty in Vietnam and U.S. Market Access (2011, background): “developing countries in response to trade shocks (see Revenga (1997), Hanson and Harrison (1999), and Feliciano (2001) for Mexico; Attanasio, Goldberg, and Pavcnik (2004) for Columbia; Currie and Harrison (1997) for Morocco; and Topalova (forthcoming) for India). Second, spatial mobility is also low”