On the rheological models used for time‐domain methods of seismic wave propagation

By P. Moczo, J. Kristek. 2005

196 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Geophysics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/01e08be8f11ad18a2167585d040b5ecd8a591eb8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

1. P. Moczo
2. Martin Balazovjech
3. M. Galis
4. P. Pazak
5. J. Kristek

In Geophysics

1. M. Galis
2. Martin Balazovjech
3. P. Pazak
4. J. Kristek
5. P. Moczo
6. Andreas Fichtner
7. Mrinal K. Sen
8. Wei Zhang

Citations in the corpus

• L1−2 minimization for exact and stable seismic attenuation compensation (2018, unknown): “First, this kind of models are typically established on laboratory or field experiments, which may fit the measured data well compared to mechanical models such as standard linear solid and generalized Maxwell body (Liu et al. 1976; Carcione et al. 1988; Moczo & Kristek 2005; Yang et al. 2016).”
• The finite-difference and finite-element modeling of seismic wave propagation and earthquake motion (2007, methodology): “Before we continue with a 3D problem, for completeness we briefly mention formalism used specifically for the GZB model, that is, before the equivalence of the GZB and GMB rheologies was presented by Moczo and Kristek (2005).”