Relative importance of isolation, area and habitat heterogeneity for vascular plant species richness of temporary wetlands in east-German farmland

By U. Brose. 2001

122 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

How tussocks structure sedge meadow vegetation (2006, background): “Although Brose (2001) argued that area is a ‘‘surrogate variable for habitat heterogeneity,’’ species richness can respond to both increased area and the greater variety of environmental conditions created by topographic heterogeneity.”
Plant species richness and composition of heathland relics in north‐western Belgium: evidence for a rescue‐effect? (2004, background): “Likein manyother habitat types (e.g.Ouborg, 1993; Quintana-Ascencio & Menges, 1996; Honnay et al., 1999a; Brose, 2001; Jacquemyn et al., 2001; Pysek et al., 2002), a positive plant species‐area relationship also seems to hold for the heathland patches in the studied region.”
ESTIMATING SPECIES RICHNESS: SENSITIVITY TO SAMPLE COVERAGE AND INSENSITIVITY TO SPATIAL PATTERNS (2003, background): “The first study was carried out on 12 temporary wetlands in East German farmland with a mean habitat area of 1078 m2 (Brose 2001).”
LOCAL VS. LANDSCAPE CONTROLS ON PLANT SPECIES RICHNESS IN BEAVER MEADOWS (2003, background): “Wetlands tend to have a patchy distribution across the landscape, and the composition of wetland plant communities can be strongly affected both by dispersal and the abiotic environment of the site (van der Valk 1981, Brose 2001).”