Analysis of several key factors influencing deep learning-based inter-residue contact prediction
By Tianqi Wu, Jie Hou, Badri Adhikari, Jianlin Cheng. 2019
35 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Abstract Motivation Deep learning has become the dominant technology for protein contact prediction. However, the factors that affect the performance of deep learning in contact prediction have not been systematically investigated. Results We analyzed the results of our three deep learning-based contact prediction methods (MULTICOM-CLUSTER, MULTICOM-CONSTRUCT and MULTICOM-NOVEL) in the CASP13 experiment and identified several key factors [i.e. deep learning technique, multiple sequence alignment (MSA), distance distribution prediction and domain-based contact integration] that influenced the contact prediction accuracy. We compared our convolutional neural network (CNN)-based contact prediction methods with three coevolution-based methods on 75 CASP13 targets consisting of 108 domains. We demonstrated that the CNN-based multi-distance approach was able to leverage global coevolutionary coupling patterns comprised of multiple correlated contacts for more accurate contact prediction than the local coevolution-based methods, leading to a substantial increase of precision by 19.2 percentage points. We also tested different alignment methods and domain-based contact prediction with the deep learning contact predictors. The comparison of the three methods showed deeper sequence alignments and the integration of domain-based contact prediction with the full-length contact prediction improved the performance of contact prediction. Moreover, we demonstrated that the domain-based contact prediction based on a novel ab initio approach of parsing domains from MSAs alone without using known protein structures was a simple, fast approach to improve contact prediction. Finally, we showed that predicting the distribution of inter-residue distances in multiple distance intervals could capture more structural information and improve binary contact prediction. Availability and implementation https://github.com/multicom-toolbox/DNCON2/. Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Subfields: Molecular Biology, Computational Biology & Bioinformatics
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Molecular Biology
- Quan Le
- Mirko Torrisi
- Pushmeet Kohli
- Alexander Pritzel
- Gianluca Pollastri
- Eirini Arvaniti
- Michael Figurnov
- Ellen D. Zhong
In Computational Biology & Bioinformatics
- Pushmeet Kohli
- Gianluca Pollastri
- Quan Le
- Kathryn Tunyasuvunakool
- Eirini Arvaniti
- Ellen D. Zhong
- Mirko Torrisi
Citations in the corpus
- Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3 (2024, methodology): “Per-residue N eff values were obtained by counting the number of non-gap residues in the MSA for this position and weighting the sequences using the N eff scheme 49 with a threshold of 80% sequence identity measured on the region that is non-gap in either sequence.”
- Deep learning methods in protein structure prediction (2020, background): “Splittingproteinsintocomposingdomains,predicting1DPSA, andoptimisingeach componentof thepipelineis particularlyuseful especially when alignment quality is poor [148].”