The Pitfalls of Pitfall Traps

By Kevin M. Enge. 2001

126 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/015ecf079a776d6bf8c3b038f37a17adc0a342f0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

1. R. Pardini
2. T. Ávila-Pires
3. M. Ribeiro‐Júnior
4. T. Gardner

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. T. Ávila-Pires
2. M. Ribeiro‐Júnior
3. Fabiana Umetsu
4. T. Gardner
5. R. Pardini

In Global and Planetary Change

1. M. Ribeiro‐Júnior
2. T. Ávila-Pires
3. R. Pardini
4. Fabiana Umetsu
5. T. Gardner

Citations in the corpus

• Evaluating the Effectiveness of Herpetofaunal Sampling Techniques across a Gradient of Habitat Change in a Tropical Forest Landscape (2008, background): “…e.g., Pearman et al., 1995; Doan, 2003), or comparing between different passive trapping techniques (e.g., Bury and Corn, 1987; Greenberg et al., 1994; Enge, 2001), with very few having evaluated both active and passive sampling methods (e.g., Crosswhite et al., 1999; Rödel and Ernst, 2004).”
• EVALUATING THE EFFICIENCY OF PITFALL TRAPS FOR SAMPLING SMALL MAMMALS IN THE NEOTROPICS (2006, background): “In tropical regions, however, the 1st studies using pitfall traps were done in recent years, both for sampling the herpetofauna (Cechin and Martins 2000; Conroy 1999; Enge 2001; Martins and Oliveira 1999; Raxworthy and Nussbaum 1994) and the small mammal fauna.”