The relationship between social values for ecosystem services and global land cover: An empirical analysis

147 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Ecosystem services and the idea of shared values (2016, background): “We see this new conception of valuation as part of a broader participative and deliberative turn in social sciences (Hanington, 2007; Rodela, 2012; Zografos and Howarth, 2010) in which individuals and groups are simultaneously producers and consumers of multiple knowledges (Bruns, 2008).”
Stocks and flows of natural and human-derived capital in ecosystem services (2016, background): “This applies to the majority of services, but perhaps more so in the case of cultural services for which typologies are still evolving (Daniel et al., 2012; Chan et al., 2012a,b; Brown, 2013; Church et al., 2014; Kenter et al., 2014).”
What are shared and social values of ecosystems (2015, background): “Sherrouse et al. (2011) and Brown (2013) discussed social values in a participatory GIS (Geographical Information Systems) context.”
‘The Matrix Reloaded': A review of expert knowledge use for mapping ecosystem services (2015, methodology): “Specific methods include social and community ES value mapping (Raymond et al., 2009; Sherrouse et al., 2011) and participatory approaches such as participatory GIS (PGIS; Palomo et al., 2012) or public participation GIS (PPGIS; Brown, 2013; Fagerholm et al., 2012).”