Efficacy and economic assessment of conventional ventilatory support versus extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe adult respiratory failure (CESAR): a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
By G. Peek, M. Mugford, R. Tiruvoipati, A. Wilson, E. Allen, Mariamma M. Thalanany, C. Hibbert, A. Truesdale, F. Clemens, N. Cooper and 2 more. The Lancet, 2009
2,726 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/01341b6c57b891ed9ca94474d969c14f77970e17
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
Citations in the corpus
- Referral to an extracorporeal membrane oxygenation center and mortality among patients with severe 2009 influenza A(H1N1). (2011, result): “domized controlled study indicated that significantly more patients with severe ARDS survived without severe disability if they were transferred to a single ECMO center compared with patients who were managed conventionally.(4) However, differences between the centers in mechanical ventilation and o”
- Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for 2009 Influenza A(H1N1) Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. (2009, background): “001), ICU stay (median [IQR], 22 [13-32] vs 12 [7-18] days; P=.”