Interpreting Developed Countries' Foreign Direct Investment
By R. Lipsey. 2000
171 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0130d8fa12e67084644fa581f6efc55d55060870
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Vinit Ranjan
- Walid Hejazi
- D. Miles
- Peter Pauly
- Muhammad Arshad Khan
- N. Vijayakumar
- K. S. Sekhara Rao
- Daniele Checchi
In Strategy and Management
- Vinit Ranjan
- Walid Hejazi
- Peter Pauly
- Muhammad Arshad Khan
- N. Vijayakumar
- K. S. Sekhara Rao
- Bart Verspagen
- P. Sridharan
Citations in the corpus
- Life on the outside: economic conditions and prospects outside euroland (2003, background): “First we stress again that there is little evidence that any lost inward FDI would reduce the size of overall domestic capital formation - Lipsey (2000) shows that there is no link between the scale of capital formation and flows of FDI.”
- Main Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment in the Southeast European Countries (2006, background): “Available data indicates that the inward and outward FDI shift jointly across time and across countries (Lipsey 2000).”
- Institutions, Foreign Direct Investment, and Domestic Investment: Crowding Out or Crowding In? (2016, background): “FDI inflow can free domestic capital and gives domestic investors more opportunity to invest in new business opportunities (Lipsey, 2000).”
- FDI Inflow Determinants in BRIC countries: A Panel Data Analysis (2011, background): “Libor Krkoska (2001) and Lipsey (2000) find little evidence of FDI having an impact on capital formation in developed countries and observe that the most important aspect of FDI in the selected sample of countries is related to ownership change.”
- Determinants of FDI in BRICS Countries: A panel analysis (2008, background): “…and found a set of explanatory variables that determine FDI flows (see: Agarwal, 1980; Gastanaga et al, 1998; Markusan and Maskus, 1999; Love and Hidalgo, 2000; Lipsey, 2000; Chakraborti, 2001; Moosa, 2002; Beven and Estrin, 2000; Singh and Jun, 1995; Sahoo, 2006; and Nunes et al., 2006 etc).”
- THE DETERMINANTS OF FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT IN PAKISTAN (2004, background): “For example Markusen and Maskus (1999), Lim (2001), Love and Lage-Hidalgo (2000), Lipsey (2000) and Moosa (2002) highlight how the domestic market size and differences in factor costs can relate to the location of FDI.”
- Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth: The Role of Domestic Financial Sector (2007, background): “In this context, Lipsey (2000) finds that inward FDI is negatively related to domestic 12FDI is also often a preferred mode of entry for foreign firms if they have firm-specific assets and try to internalise them through intra-firm transactions.”
- Adjusting Labour Demand: Multinational vs. National Firms. A Cross-European Analysis (2003, background): “FDI flows directed to developed economies, mainly in the form of mergers and acquisitions, have been growing at an accelerated pace throughout the past decade (see, e.g., UNCTAD (1999), Lipsey (2000), Shatz and Venables (2001)).”
- Motivations for FDI and domestic capital formation (2003, background): “Using data for 17 OECD countries over the 1960s and 1970s, the findings show that outward FDI reduces GFCF Other studies include Stevens and Lipsey (1992), who find that outward FDI and domestic GFCF are positively related, Rao et al. (1994), who find either a positive or no effect of outward FDI on”