CommonGen: A Constrained Text Generation Challenge for Generative Commonsense Reasoning

By Bill Yuchen Lin, Ming Shen, Wangchunshu Zhou, Pei Zhou, Chandra Bhagavatula, Yejin Choi, Xiang Ren. 2020

417 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Recently, large-scale pre-trained language models have demonstrated impressive performance on several commonsense-reasoning benchmark datasets. However, building machines with commonsense to compose realistically plausible sentences remains challenging. In this paper, we present a constrained text generation task, CommonGen associated with a benchmark dataset, to explicitly test machines for the ability of generative commonsense reasoning. Given a set of common concepts (e.g., dog, frisbee, catch, throw); the task is to generate a coherent sentence describing an everyday scenario using these concepts (e.g., “a man throws a frisbee and his dog catches it”). The CommonGen task is challenging because it inherently requires 1) relational reasoning with background commonsense knowledge and 2) compositional generalization ability to work on unseen concept combinations. Our dataset, constructed through a combination of crowdsourced and existing caption corpora, consists of 77k commonsense descriptions over 35k unique concept-sets. Experiments show that there is a large gap between state-of-the-art text generation models (e.g., T5) and human performance (31.6% v.s. 63.5% in SPICE metric). Furthermore, we demonstrate that the learned generative commonsense reasoning capability can be transferred to improve downstream tasks such as CommonsenseQA (76.9% to 78.4 in dev accuracy) by generating additional context.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Natural Language Processing, Evaluation & Benchmarks

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Mohit Bansal
  2. Yejin Choi
  3. Luke S. Zettlemoyer
  4. Jianfeng Gao
  5. Hannaneh Hajishirzi
  6. Percy Liang
  7. Noah A. Smith
  8. Graham Neubig

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

  1. Luc Van Gool
  2. Mohit Bansal
  3. Dacheng Tao
  4. Trevor Darrell
  5. Yi Yang
  6. Xiaogang Wang
  7. Andrew Zisserman
  8. Jianfeng Gao

In Natural Language Processing

  1. Yejin Choi
  2. Mohit Bansal
  3. Luke S. Zettlemoyer
  4. Hannaneh Hajishirzi
  5. Noah A. Smith
  6. Percy Liang
  7. Graham Neubig
  8. Jianfeng Gao

In Evaluation & Benchmarks

  1. Yejin Choi
  2. Mohit Bansal
  3. Hannaneh Hajishirzi
  4. Luke S. Zettlemoyer
  5. Daniel Khashabi
  6. Noah A. Smith
  7. Ronan Le Bras
  8. Xiang Ren

Citations in the corpus