Self-supervised learning for medical image classification: a systematic review and implementation guidelines
By Anuj Pareek, Malte E. K. Jensen, Matthew P. Lungren, Serena Yeung, A. Chaudhari. npj Digit. Medicine, 2023
468 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Advancements in deep learning and computer vision provide promising solutions for medical image analysis, potentially improving healthcare and patient outcomes. However, the prevailing paradigm of training deep learning models requires large quantities of labeled training data, which is both time-consuming and cost-prohibitive to curate for medical images. Self-supervised learning has the potential to make significant contributions to the development of robust medical imaging models through its ability to learn useful insights from copious medical datasets without labels. In this review, we provide consistent descriptions of different self-supervised learning strategies and compose a systematic review of papers published between 2012 and 2022 on PubMed, Scopus, and ArXiv that applied self-supervised learning to medical imaging classification. We screened a total of 412 relevant studies and included 79 papers for data extraction and analysis. With this comprehensive effort, we synthesize the collective knowledge of prior work and provide implementation guidelines for future researchers interested in applying self-supervised learning to their development of medical imaging classification models.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/011982dc2b422bbbf1b0e3b8874d8d4f1b2027f2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
In Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
Citations in the corpus
- A transformer-based representation-learning model with unified processing of multimodal input for clinical diagnostics (2023, background): “, adverse clinical outcome prediction of COVID-19 patients, the available clinical data can be divided into four categories: demographics (age and gender), the structured chief complaint that consists of comorbidities (7) and symptoms (9), and laboratory-test results (19).”