Methodological and Content Review of Lesbian-, Gay-, and Bisexual-Related Articles in Counseling Journals: 1990-1999

By Julia C. Phillips, K. M. Ingram, N. Smith, E. Mindes. 2003

109 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Reproductive Medicine, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0117532399480563c8b975c26367982760acb9ec

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Reproductive Medicine

1. M. Brewster
2. Bonnie Moradi
3. C. DeBlaere
4. Roger L. Worthington
5. M. Paz Galupo

In Social Psychology

1. Bonnie Moradi
2. M. Goodman
3. F. Dillon
4. M. Brewster
5. Roger L. Worthington
6. Aubrey L. DeCarlo
7. K. Bertsch
8. Candice Presseau

Citations in the corpus

• The Protective Power of Collective Action for Sexual Minority Women of Color (2014, background): “Sexual minority women of color represent intersections of oppressed race and ethnicity, gender, and sexual orientation identities (Bowleg, Craig, & Burkholder, 2004; Phillips et al., 2003).”
• Examining Objectification Theory (2008, background): “…bisexual, lesbian, or gay (Chung & Katayama, 1996), various scholars have emphasized the importance of assessing sexual orientation on multiple dimensions as well as distinguishing between sexual preference, sexual orientation, and sexual identity (e.g., Phillips et al., 2003; Sell, 1997).”
• Conducting Research With LGB People of Color: Methodological Challenges and Strategies (2010, background): “First, relying on traditional sampling and recruitment from LGB organizations and venues typically results in small samples of LGB people of color (Buhrke et al., 1992; Phillips et al., 2003).”
• Content Analysis of Literature About LGB People of Color: 1998-2007 (2010, background): “Two recent studies, published in The Counseling Psychologist, analyzed literatures about people of color (Delgado-Romero, Galvan, Maschino, & Rowland, 2005) and LGB issues (Phillips et al., 2003).”
• Sexual identity as a universal process (2011, methodology): “... of research on sexual diversity in psychology have indicated that the most common method of assessing what we term the sexual orientation identity (others term sexual orientation or sexual orientation label) of participants is to request self-identification as gay, lesbian, bisexual, heterosexua”