The Coming of Age of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine

By Vimla L. Patel, Edward H. Shortliffe, M. Stefanelli, Peter Szolovits, Michael R. Berthold, Riccardo Bellazzi, Ameen Abu-Hanna. 2008

549 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Summary This paper is based on a panel discussion held at the Artificial Intelligence in Medicine Europe (AIME) conference in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, in July 2007. It had been more than 15 years since Edward Shortliffe gave a talk at AIME in which he characterized artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine as being in its “adolescence” (Shortliffe EH. The adolescence of AI in medicine: Will the field come of age in the ‘90s? Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 1993; 5:93–106). In this article, the discussants reflect on medical AI research during the subsequent years and attempt to characterize the maturity and influence that has been achieved to date. Participants focus on their personal areas of expertise, ranging from clinical decision making, reasoning under uncertainty, and knowledge representation to systems integration, translational bioinformatics, and cognitive issues in both the modeling of expertise and the creation of acceptable systems.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Health Informatics, Health Information Management

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Chao Yu
  2. Jiming Liu
  3. Shamim Nemati
  4. Jun Xia
  5. Guang Yang
  6. Qinghao Ye
  7. Emilio Soria-Olivas
  8. José David Martín-Guerrero

In Health Informatics

  1. Chao Yu
  2. Shamim Nemati
  3. Jiming Liu
  4. Guoqi Ren

In Health Information Management

  1. Jun Xia
  2. Guang Yang
  3. Qinghao Ye

Citations in the corpus